Dear Andrew Robinson: I Know Whats Inside Your Speakers.
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 10 апр 2025
- Dear Andrew Robinson: I Know Whats Inside Your Speakers.
Andrews Channel: / @andrewrobinsonreviews
Andrews video: • WHAT IS INSIDE YOUR SP...
Check us out: GR-Research.com
Danny, I love your hospitality and It makes you one of my favorite people on the internet.
Thank you Danny, I learned so much about crossover design from your videos, I was able to modify the kit I purchased, I am so impressed by simply changing the caps and resistors, about 65 bucks and found out the supplied components were worth less than 12 dollars. The best speaker I have ever owned!
This is the most humble and informative "get off my lawn" I have ever seen.
Is it? He literally said he is NOT motivated by money at all. Everyone is motivated by money to some degree. Money is a unit of time and resources. So that’s like saying he doesn’t care about TIME. Ive never heard of this company. I’m NOT saying it’s a bad company or that they make bad products. Not to stick up for Andrew. But he NEVER even mentioned this man’s company. He is the owner of the company, right? He sounds like he’s trying to sell me something, that’s not an insult.
What you do is a very valuable service. I review, build and teardown in-ear monitors and i've seen a LOT of bad engineering and thought to myself, "man i'd hate to waste this potential"
the crossover is the most important piece of a multi-speaker enclosures. It is the literal beating heart of the speaker.
What GR Research does is greatly appreciated, most speakers are overpriced. Also what GR does is no different than adding a custom exhaust to your car or better brakes or intercooler to improve it’s performance.
Over priced? And with his improvements they are 2x the price.
@@twtwtw1 when people paid $10k set of speakers , spending an upgrade parts is well worth the money otherwise replacing speakers are more costly right Thank You.
@@twtwtw1 A lot of them are just because sonicaps are bananas expensive. However, I do wish at times he would lean into more opinion on his upgrades.
Like for instance, in some cases the speaker is better, but it's limited by the driver or tweeter being poor in the first place and it makes sense to just buy (or make) a new speaker, and sell the old one on ebay. Like selling the RP 600m, and buying XLS encores, is roughly same cost as upgrading the RP 600m with his kit, but is a substantially worse speaker.
I imagine some of his upgrades are worth it, and some of his upgrades it just makes more sense to buy a better speaker.
But, at the same time that can confuse customers, because people cannot handle nuance.
@@tomshaner3553 too true. What would Andrew Robinson say about that?!
Weak link theory - maximizing the value or improving something usually involves making tweaks at the weak links 1st, in this case of a signal path…
Same for when I play my bass guitar and put my gearhead hat on: I know I can put in different pickups that will give it different voicing, or strings that will produce a different timbre, or replace the bridge with one that will offer more sustain, etc…at times these are just a simple matter of preference, other times you are kind of fixing something. Another example - in most living rooms over 50% of what you hear is reflected sound! I’m hopping around here but wanting to improve things or simply enjoying tweaking things is not a bad thing!!
Paul from PS Audio also recommends upgrading capacitors with better ones of the same value when the time comes. Last, people modify their cars and etc, there's no difference. The consumer has the ultimate say.
Man, your honesty and openness is what it's all about. Just listen and tell us what you hear. Amen. That attitude separates you from the crowd in my opinion. Keep that ethos and you can't go wrong.
You are super respectful!!! Love what you do and agree 100%!!
Appreciate your support. You’re right, Danny. You provide great value that is not recognized by all. I learn from you all the time and will continue to support. Cheers
Does this RUclipsr own this company? He’s not motivated by money so we should be handing out free speakers. this guy is a sales men. Of course he’s motivated by money. Who TF is not motivated by money. You can say “I’m not solely motivated by money” but he did NOT say that. Either way it’s a lie. Im not motivated by money, but keep buying my speakers. Is the stock market close to a recession? Who cares, buy this man’s speakers. He doesn’t care about money. Benjamin Franklin used to say “believe people’s actions, not their words”. Ignore everything I just said everything I wrote and go on a spending spree and buy every product this guy offers.
Lots of people are interested in what goes into products that they buy or would like to buy. "This Old House" is a prime example of people wanting know what goes into making things operate or work the best. This increases their comfort level when making decisions on what to purchase, what effects it's performance, what elements influence it's characteristics. Some others really don't care and purchase based on advertisements (sheep), what is considered better than their neighbours (sad), what their buddy recommends (lazy?), or what they feel like at that particular time (more money than ambition or brains?). I know who I like sharing my time and energy with. Carry on GR Research.
Truly excellent example of an informal and non-confrontational re-buff!! Great info and great video!!!
Perfectly done. By an obvious expert. Danny knows his S!&@t !
You are a professional!
There are many customers who are not interested in learning, or understanding
And there is a public that likes to delve deeper into the product, to understand that they are really getting the best, or trying to make a better product themselves.
Thank you for your service.
We should be concerned about what’s inside. It can reveal what the consumer is actually paying for. It’s not for everyone but for some it does matter.
I had one guy tell me his $14 earbuds sound better than most $4000 speaker systems. And I had another idiot tell me that the specs on his computer's CD player says "0 to 50,000 Hz", therefore all music he listens to through his computer is 0 to 50KHz. And there was no convincing him otherwise.
So you are right.... there really are people who should never, ever, ever see the inside of anything.
And the really mind blowing part is, both were arguing with me on the discussion page of the wikipedia entry for "audiophile".
Absolutely!
But as Danny always says, all the manufacturer build to a pricepoint. And more people like shiny stuff than a black box with great parts inside you cannot see. So they spend money on design and build of a nice shiny box. Parts don't bring customers, high gloss videos about nice speakers do ;-)
💯 correct.
If the parts are spectacular and of immaculate standards and it is not voiced correctly it doesn’t matter. Andrew’s whole point is how does it sound stop taking everything apart and just listen to the music and enjoy. If it doesn’t sound good return it and try something new. Stop trying to fix something not designed correctly in the first place.
I watch tons of audio reviews and I have to say this was one of the most informative videos I have seen. Keep up the good works Much appreciated.
I can personally vouch for what the service GR Research provides. I had my PSB 800 crossover tested, and bought new parts to rebuild it; and I was amazed at the difference in sound quality. I could A/B with my old crossover and hear a big difference! I know the service they provide is worth the money.
This has me interested. I've got a pair of PSB 600's, as well as a pair of PSB century 600i's. I also recently purchased a pair of PSB Image B6's that while in great cosmetic shape, came with bulging capacitors. I've been looking at repairing the B6's but now I'm thinking I should upgrade all three sets. If you don't mind me asking how much did it cost in parts to fix up those PSB 800's?
Thank you for making electronics FUN again.. 😁 I was 12 years of age when I started building simple electronic projects, had a career in engineering, I'm 51 now and I'm still building/repairing/upgrading stuff, mostly high end (tube)amplifiers; improving transformers, caps, resistors, pots, etc.... Not for the money, just for FUN! Glad to see the DIY scene hasn't entirely vanished yet due to lack of time.
Have been listening to stereo components for over 60 years and gr research seems to be one of the most thoughtful commentators I have ever listened to online. I knew someone back in Boulder Colorado in 40 years ago whose whole business is just a little home business was to replace the crossovers with more high quality parts to improve reasonably good stereo speakers. So this guy makes sense... And his presentations are always balanced and thoughtful.
Was that Uncle Joey?
I appreciate what you do, Danny! Got my start in the 1970’s with a Speakerlab kit (remember those?), and I’ve opened and worked on every single speaker I’ve ever purchased. Why oh why does every manufacturer cheap out on something so basic as damping material?! 😂 I don’t have a treated room and I’ve never spent huge amounts of money on speakers, but if you love sound, how can you NOT be curious about what’s inside?! Keep it up, man! 👏
Audio is like the automotive industry. 99% of the folks out there buy a stereo system and they are done. Then there is that 1% that likes tweak what they have. They might use heavy gauge OFC wires. They might replace their op-amps with a higher grade chips. And some might tweak the crossover. Hot rodders have been tweaking cars for years.
Great point
That's exactly who Danny is. Racing the quarter mile is another of his passions. I can't see the video right now. But I think he's wearing a drag racing t-shirt.
I quit watching Andrew a couple years ago after he made a egotistical and disrespectful response to my fair comment😂
Excellent analogy. I've never left a car stock for more than a month, and once I got into diy and customized speakers, I'll never go back. It's crazy how much manufacturers leave on the table. Upgrading the crossover parts is like going from stock garbage shocks to some adjustable Koni shocks.
@@JC-lk3oy Maybe with exceptions as it is a T50 from Gordon Murray! But not all cars and equipment are at that level, possibly none, so I understand what you mean.
BRAVO, DANNY!!! Great info, clearly spoken, wonderfully impartial. Thank you Bro.
This may get some people riled up.
While I think Andrew could have been less condescending with his feelings towards the speaker modding/upgrading community, i very much understand his point.
He doesn't review DIY/modded equipment. His reviews have to be based on what he receives from a manufacturer or retail store. It truly doesn't matter what parts are in the product. If it's good, he explains why. If it's not, he explains why. If it's really bad, he doesn't post a review.
His channel has never been about telling viewers to buy something, take it to someone else to fix problems with it, then take it home and enjoy it.
I guarantee that, as long as he's been in the HIFI world, he understands what crossover parts do to a signal. It's just that, for the purpose of what he and Kristie do with their channel, they don't matter.
If you don't like the way a speaker sounds from the factory, don't buy it. Definitely don't buy expecting Danny to be able to work miracles and make it sound like something that would cost you $3-4K more than what you paid. Just buy one of Danny's kits and get the good stuff the first time.
Much as I don't come to Danny's channel for info on how well a particular pair of Paradigm towers might blend in with the decor of my living room, i don't go to Andrew's channel for detailed technical analysis of how they perform. I watch Andrew and Kristie to get info about it would be to live with a particular product as it comes from the manufacturer.
A fair & balanced comment!
Somebody gets it!
This!
If that's not what his channel is about, and you're right, it isn't, then he should never have made a video like that.
I really don't think he (Andrew) made a point!!!
Danny you've got class thanks for all you have taught me.👍👍👍👍👍👍
Difference is, some people listen with their ears, others listen with their eyes.
EXACTLY... We are dealing with AUDIO, and make quality decisions on what we see (cosmetics)... Imagine, going to buy a fine painting for your living room, and instead of looking at it, you make your decisions based on licking it....Would you do that???
@@grahamstrahle4010 and others listen with computers, if everything in this world was perfect, which is an impossibility, the world would be a boring place.
Danny is also talking to folks with disposable income. The kind that can have it to spend 10k for what's considered a mid level amplifier or those where money doesn't matter at all and perfection does. Man I just ain't got that kinda of money, further, one person's trash is another person's treasure, just ask anyone who's ever been divorced and remarried another divorcee and had been happily married for 20 years.
Trust your ears, if it sounds good to you than it sounds good, if it sounds great then it sounds great, to you. It might not to me even after putting Danny's expensive crossovers in speakers that already cost way to much money. Power to y'all, I'm glad if you got that kinda of disposable income, I for one do not and it's my hard earned money, I'm gonna buy what sounds great to my ears, if they don't after I get them home and have broken them in they go back to where that came from and the search continues. I'm not going to void the warranty only to find out after broken in they don't sound good "to my ears"!!
It's VERY expensive, so it must be good....
personally i use my perenium
And Danny listens by measuring. It doesn't get worse than that.
When these things devolve into personal criticism they completely lose me.
I get both points of view.
For me, if the quality of the sound is (subjectively to me) is commensurate with the price, then we’re good.
DIY upgrades are a perfectly legitimate way to enjoy the hobby. OTOH, Expecting speakers to sound good with out upgrades is reasonable.
The $/sound ratio is what matters.
As someone whose solder joints look like used bubble gum, I need a decent sound from the factory.
You both have perfectly valid opinions. So let’s get back to the music.
Finally, a civilized comment without attacking any of the parties involved 👍❤
I like your practicality and common sense.
Class act Danny.
Not really. Andrew & Kristi didn't say GR Research or even make that suggestion as there are many DIY folks. Therefore this public direct call out by Danny man is a bit much. An email or phone call to Andrew & Kristi would've been MUCH more appropriate and professional. A direct call out isn't a good way to win someone over or send an invite for a visit. What I see is Danny using a call out to gain attention of Andrew & Kristi's audience to boost sales. Really Danny? Really??? Not only am I embarrassed, I'm embarrassed for you.
@@lithiumstatic I see Danny putting the truth out on how parts matter, and when Andrew said 'who cares what's on the inside', I thought that was quite ill informed, to put it mildly. We shall see what Andrew is made of by how he responds.
Hello folks. I feel Andrew has a bit of narcissist behavior.
This is the second time or same type of reply as the first time. Calling out all reviewers. Now those who did visit Danny's they walk out going home. With brand new perspective.
Ride Easy
@@BootJamesOut Funny you would call Andrew a narcissist when he never pointed out anyone in specific. Who's publicly calling out who??? Danny. I won't drop him a label, but you can figure it out if you're able to be unbiased. Last don't mistake confidence for narcissism which you're clearly doing.
@@pounceonyou1958 He responded live with humility and apologetically. Something Danny would never do even though he's the one making public finger pointing call outs. Looks much more like he's using it to draw customers from Andrews channel. Really sad to see that kind of behavior. Also really sad to see biased folks patting Danny on the back for being on online bully.
A couple of years a ago, I took my Jamo 7.2 speakers in to have my bass woofers repaired. My speakers were 20 years old at the time. The repair shop gave me the option to rebuild my crossovers. There was no need to redesign, just upgrade very old and very cheap components. WOW! What a difference. I spent close to $1000, but the difference was nothing short of amazing. I think Danny is providing a much needed service. It is a shame that speaker manufacturers go cheap on the crossover components, but they do. I am sure some of the improvement was because the components were old, but I know they never sounded this good even when new. By the way, the tweeters and midrange drivers were still in great shape and nothing was done to them.
Same as the guys I know that get car systems, they buy the same speakers ect. but one guy always changes crossover ect and doesn't use the all in one block that you can buy, he does it with little resistors ect and his stereo systems sound 3xs as good.
I've done gr-research upgrades to rp8000f and lrs+ speakers, and they're both phenomenal.
I have RP280F's. Thinking about it myself.
@photoguybrian definitely worth it
Do you think Henry kloss tower 2 speakers or the ads L780/2 speakers would be worth the upgrade or upgrade the speakers all the way around?
@johnnewcomb5162 Yes, they're worth it.
@@johnnewcomb5162 I would rather have a model down with the upgrade regardless of the brand.
Well put together Danny!! , I have told you before, I truly think you have had a huge part in resurrecting Hifi and get soooo many young people back in the hobby. Cudos and thanks
I follow and enjoy both the AR and GR channels. When I saw the original AR video, I anticipated this response from GR. Personally, I took AR's "don't care" comments in a different context. He's using the "black box" reviewing technique, in that whatever he can't hear or see from the outside is irrelevant. He's "blind testing" things such as the crossover components, dampening material, bracing and binding post material, which aren't visible to him. He can't control the decisions made by the designer and therefore "doesn't care" how the designer got to the end result, only how it fares against the direct competition with its outward characteristics (i.e. sound, aesthetics, construction). Ultimately, he's judging it by the same characteristics as the typical end consumer. I'm sure he appreciates (and can likely hear) the benefits of better crossover components, non-magnetic binding posts, etc. but he also realizes the cost concessions required at certain price points and trade-offs to be made. Perhaps, instead of saying "doesn't care", a more accurate statement would be "I don't want to know". He's relying on his senses for the review and doesn't want to influenced by the brand name on some crossover component.
The audio market is composed of different types of consumers. I haven't watched AR's channel, but the clip tells me that his viewers are mostly people who are not going to be interested in DIY and/or upgrading a speaker's x-overs. Most people are not interested in being audiophiles or spending time to understand the technology that makes audio possible. Nothing wrong with that. But GR Research is geared towards those who DO want to invest in creating a high end listening experience, and AR's statement about not caring about the crossover was stupid and seemed aimed to cast shade on the audiophiles who would claim that crossovers really do have an appreciable impact.
@brentwalker8596 your take away from the clip seems to have completely missed the mark, but that seems to be Danny's intention.
It is the difference between a paid listener and an engineer. It’s that simple. Some people will pay 100X for something they can plug in over 2X that is better.
Keep it up!
You want more drama? 🎭 Please make upgrade kits for Tekton speakers 🔊
Yes!!
HA!!!! LMAO
@@SkunkieDesignsElectronics right?
LOL that would be more than drama.
LOOOOL!!!!!
A truly genuine dude. No bullshit. I used to put sound system in peoples' homes in the 80s. I used to tell them then that the most important part of your system was the room!!! I like this guy, not hidden agendas, just trying to educate people who think that a bluetooth speaker is the best way to reproduce music with accuracy. You will never hear the hard work that the engineer put into the mix to get the most realistic soundstage of a recorded guest without paying close attention to how that complex waveform gets to your ears. Built to a pricepoint. love it. If you take ego out of the equation of most "reviewers" they would see that you are indeed correct!
Andrew said that he doesn't think it makes sense to buy speakers that need to be improved later, but it makes more sense to buy speakers that you like right from the start. And what does it matter what's inside the speakers if you like how they sound? Then everything will be fine. If you like speakers in which the manufacturer has used cheap parts, that's your problem.

That's true. Some people are okay with just okay. Some people want more.
Some people don't know when to stop either. Some people are never satisfied and never sit down and just enjoy the music. I see people "upgrading" all the time and never going to be happy. Most people are just splitting hairs when it comes to what's coming out of their system and feel they need to "UPGREADE". If that's what you like more power to you. I'll just sit back and enjoy life and music...
Why is it a problem?
What if you like the speakers when you buy them but over time notice some things that could be improved?
@@danab7472 like what? Just asking
I'm a customer of yours both products and upgrades love what you do and the fact you share your knowledge. Your not trying to bull us. I have enjoyed learning from you and have upgraded my cheep speaks that now sound better. Thank you!!!!
Saying parts quality doesn't matter in audio is like saying food quality doesn't matter in cooking.
I think he sad that he doesn’t care , not that the parts don’t matter. Two different things
Bien dit 🙂
@tysonn4736
He was simply saying that as long as the speaker performs as intended. It doesn't matter the parts used. You know, about 45 years ago, this wasn't even a topic of conversation. The JBL100 is one of the most popular speakers in history. Not once during its heyday did anyone ask about crossover parts quality! I wonder why in recent history suddenly it's an important matter?
@@anthonyjackson7097 yes because we had no way to measure all those things back then!!! he was skewering gr's business model and all of the good they do for customers .
@@anthonyjackson7097 Exactly
I'm so glad that you made this video. I'll be putting together a system in a few months. You are now my #1 choice of speaker manufacturer. I think you really clarified some misconceptions. Thank you!
I'm a fan of Andrew Robinson and watched that particular video, and I have to say he's wrong. I'm an electronic engineer by trade and someone who loves audio. It really matters to me the quality of the crossover and the impact it can have. Speakers that have high-quality crossover parts are unfortunately overpriced, so upgrades can be an affordable route without the financial impact.
@@robmccoy21 Why would one need to upgrade high quality crossovers? I don’t understand…
@@zizendorfBetter sound. Better clarity. Vocals are easier to understand. Details which get masked by cheap parts become more prevalent.
My first crossover upgrade was shocking with how much information was being muted by the cheap parts.
Why not just buy a different speaker?
@@ChadHuisinga That’s certainly another option. Everyone who sends their speakers to Danny are either curious or have speakers they aren’t happy with. I doubt many are buying new speakers with the intention of upgrading them. I’m sure some have. I almost did it to a pair of Sony SSCS5s.
I started upgrading crossover parts over a decade ago. I did one out of a pair of speakers so I could compare stock to upgraded. It was no contest. The stock speaker was noticeably duller and muted details. Cost of the upgrade was less than $200. This was on a $400 pair of Polk speakers. I did it to multiple brands of used speakers. Every time the stock crossovers did the same thing. Brand name speakers are always sold at a price point. The cost of the parts to a speaker is roughly 20%. Since most people aren’t even aware of crossover circuitry they are blissfully unaware of what they are missing.
But if you like your speakers as they are then good for you! You don’t need GR Research.
@@zizendorfThat's not what he was talking about. He was comparing an "over-priced" speaker with a high quality crossover with a more budget friendly speaker that is upgraded with higher quality components.
Qudos to Danny for taking the high ground. He used it as a teaching opportunity, not getting sucked into a spat.
I was dubious about being able to hear changes in components... Until i tried it.
It really is astonishing what the human ear can differentiate.
He also understands the psychology of the diy audio enthusiast...
Some people throw money at something and want to believe they have "the best". It bolsters their ego somehow and makes them feel superior.
Whereas the diy guy sees it as an incremental journey of improvement... With no expectation of ever reaching perfection, but a determination to keep striving for it.
It's an interesting hobby, not a consumer fashion statement.
When you took off your glasses and zoomed in on the affiliate links…
Epic!
This was brilliant.
Nonsense and tiring. I think Danny is only click baiting for his channel anymore off of more successful and better produced channels.
@@ChadHuisinga It's pretty obvious that someone trying to sell you the product isn't going to highlight any flaws in it. They're literally incentivized to portray the product in a positive light regardless.
@@ChadHuisinga Danny got called out. How is he click baiting?
Epic indeed. Ouch!
The alleged shill reviewers sound like timeshare salesmen
Danny went through his bona fides recently and yet he has to address the alleged shill reviewers
One reason I build my own speakers is that the mark-up is insane and you generally get crap parts
Ignore the shill reviewers
Danny, I appreciate your content and I appreciate Andrew's content. I also get that Andrew seemed to be the first one to fling the poo so here we are. I think right here says it all 33:50 --what I mean by this is, you're going to have to accept that your audience and Andrew's audience aren't necessarily the same person. That stated, there are people in Andrew's audience who might be interested in your level where the reverse might not be as true. Do you see where I'm going with this?
Not everyone and in fact most people (including myself) who appreciate audio are going to have the budget or the lifestyle (or let's face it, a significant other that might be less passionate on the topic) that allows them to have a dedicated room and automotive level budget for high-end audio. I'm a musician and talk about gear, I own most of the things that create the sounds that audiophiles gush over. You think my Hammond A100, Rhodes Mark I Seventythree, 50's era Wurlitzer, Amps, Mics, Basses, Guitars, Synths and all the outboard gear live at home?? Wooo the divorce papers would be a comin'
At home I have a decent sound system with some Bob Gross Super TLs and a simple Marantz 2235B. My turntable is a Kenwood KD550. My streamer is a Bluesound Node. The speakers are off the wall but there's no sound treatment going on, my 90 year old raised foundation, flat walled, hard wood floored home resonates like crazy (its kind of fun actually). Could I do better? Absolutely I could and probably will down the road BUT do I like what I have, YES. Do I know it's not perfect? Of course.
Andrew is coming at it from a little more of "don't sweat the small stuff" approach. While he might be making money with affiliates, remember, the measure of responsibility you're holding Andrew to, is your measure, not his. His measure aligns more with the casual listener who maybe wants to get into the hobby because they love music but isn't interested in the micro-science and precise levels of engineering that you are. He's listening and measuring speakers in an imperfect environment because that reflects his viewers. That's what makes Andrew, Andrew and you, you. I mean we're in a world where 98% of people are listening to their favorite songs on cell phone speakers or horrible earbuds, I give anyone credit who wants to hear something in better fidelity than that.
I believe what Andrew is getting to are people that are interested in the hobby but they want the systems that blend into their lifestyle, not consume it. Maybe one day they'll really want to get into the quality and engineering of it, that's when they'll find you. That's exactly how I found you.
I watched about 20 seconds of Robinson and that was enough. Very telling he doesn't understand industries selling billion$ of upgrades for headers, turbo chargers, chips, and 1000's of upgrades for cars that were already 'just fine'. He doesn't understand that piddling around with this stuff is our hobby a lot of the time and it's fun and satisfying. It's not just audio, is what I'm saying. People love to try to improve things they enjoy. Poor guy probably never stepped into a Radio Shack back in the day. He's a video version of Stereophile magazine, which I loved in the 90's until it just became a pump for the overpriced audio companies, which became boring.
I can't stand Andrew Robinson. Really hard to watch and listen to
You did a good point!
The room is a big part of a system. But still i yet have to find a trustfull source for correct room treatment guides. Any video is marketed with brands. I step out and quit after i hear. Our sponsor blabla-Audio….
Without a shop its impossible to get it to the right direction nowadays. There is so much wrong things out there.
My take on it…. Maybe i miss something..
One last thing. Less than 1% of ppl wanna have dedicated listening room. There is always a canvas or a TV between the speakers.
Its bad i know but its reality! No one focus on things ppl want.
The guts ARE important. The high end audio industry is NOTORIOUS for not only snake oil but "reviews" that often feel like paid ads. Manufacturers have privately admitted that when they set HIGHER prices, their products are perceived as better by the high end industry in general. The budget of a product allocated to cosmetics alone can be a significant chunk of the selling price.
Fo-Sho ! - But Damm the finish on Wilson speakers Is Freakin Sweet !! ( lol
@@DarrenShaw-ev5tb LOL And Sonus Faber too! They're gorgeous. But I purchase speakers for sound not how they look.
@@zizendorf So you buy a car based on 0 to 60 and not the looks or the colour or options like leather etc? I call BS
@@carlosoliveira-rc2xt Well you can call bullshit all you want. I didn't come here for an argument. However, I did research for a year and then searched for an Audi A6 Avant. Found one, based upon 0-60. Bought it and didn't give two shits that it was silver. But, you're right, it does have a leather interior. They all do. I'd have purchased it regardless of it's color. LOL
@zizendorf Ok…but if you have two different pairs of speakers that sound identical…and one looks better to you than the other….which
pair are you going to go with? Can you really say looks aren’t important at all?
If you’re happy with your speakers stick with them and don’t worry about upgrades. If you want more or are interested in exploring, the upgrades are for you. I personally enjoy the educational aspect of upgrades. Like a lot of things it doesn’t have to be one or the other. Different strokes for different folks.
Andrew Robinson's point seems to be that upgrading a speaker's crossover may not always offer the best value. After purchasing speakers and then investing in crossover upgrades, you may have spent enough money that it would have been better to invest in a higher-quality speaker from the start, avoiding the additional work and hassle. While DIY speaker projects can be enjoyable and are a valid hobby, for the average person who may not want to invest the time and effort, their money could be better spent elsewhere.
Although crossover upgrades can make a difference in sound quality, the improvement doesn't always justify the cost. Spending significant money on upgrades may only result in a marginal improvement, without addressing the inherent limitations of the speaker's design. True innovation in speaker performance comes from a ground-up approach that considers the entire design, not just the crossover. Ultimately, how a speaker measures in performance is often more important than individual component selections when it comes to how it will sound. This isn't meant to criticize anyone's choices but simply reflects a personal opinion. Cheers!
This opinion added some fog and haze to the concept.
Let me tell you , even my car stereos tweeter sounds way better when I replaced factory tiny electrolyte 6.8uf for a 6usd worth audio poly cap .... Difference is significant to a trained ear , not to mention , resistors that also make a difference, than inductors , internal wiring , cabinet enhancements, binding posts upgrade and all of it improves the sound .
So cheap speaker sold for 200usd can be greatly improved by spending 70usd for better caps and resistors, coils , just pick wisely to stay in this tight budget and YES it will make these 70 USD speakers sound much much better and well worth 70usd spend on better quality parts .
Than if you approach 600usd speakers and say you decide to spend 140usd on parts to upgrade the crossovers the difference on such speaker will be even greater ... Proportions and logic in such upgrade is a key for it to make sense .
"Ultimately, how a speaker measures in performance is often more important than individual component selections when it comes to how it will sound."
I'm not saying you're wrong, but I don't see how you can come to that conclusion. I can give you the specs to a speaker and you can't tell me how its going to sound. Let me give you a real example of what I'm talking about. I'm very sensitive to high frequencies. You can have a metal tweeter and a soft dome tweeter that measures very close, if not the same, and can sound very different in actual use. Measurements are not going to tell you that.
@@052RC I appreciate your perspective, and I agree that measurements alone can't fully capture the subjective experience of listening to a speaker. What I meant by "how a speaker measures far exceeds parts selections" is that while individual components, like tweeters, do contribute to the overall sound, the performance of the entire speaker system - as indicated by how it measures across various parameters - often provides a better indication of its overall quality and design than simply focusing on component selection in isolation.
To your point, measurements might not always reveal specific nuances such as listener sensitivity to certain frequencies or tonal preferences. However, they do provide a more objective baseline for comparing performance and understanding how the speaker was engineered. So, while measurements may not tell the whole story, they are a key part of understanding speaker performance when considered alongside subjective listening tests. I fully acknowledge that sound is a subjective experience and can vary significantly from person to person. For example, as you pointed out, two tweeters that measure similarly might sound quite different to someone sensitive to high frequencies. While measurements offer an objective baseline for performance, they can’t account for personal preferences or sensitivities.
It's definitely a balance between objective data and personal listening experience. Thanks again for engaging in the discussion!
@@kdomster9141 Thank you for your input. I completely understand the perspective you're coming from, and I don’t doubt that upgrading components like capacitors, resistors, and inductors can improve the sound of a speaker, particularly for someone with a trained ear. However, my point was more about the broader balance between cost, time, and the overall design of the speaker itself.
You’re right that a budget speaker can be improved with better components, but there are inherent limitations in what can be achieved due to the overall design of the speaker. Cabinet design, driver quality, and tuning play a significant role in a speaker’s performance, and those factors often can't be fully addressed by just upgrading the crossover. While spending $70 on upgrades may improve a $200 speaker, it’s important to recognize that the improvements may be marginal when compared to purchasing a speaker that was designed from the ground up with higher-quality components, cabinetry, and tuning.
There’s also the consideration of diminishing returns. As you mentioned, the difference might be more significant in a $600 speaker, but there comes a point where the cost of upgrading components may not deliver improvements that justify the expense. High-end speakers are typically designed with a balanced integration of all parts, not just components, so modifying one area might yield subtle changes, but won't necessarily unlock the full potential of the speaker.
Ultimately, upgrading components can provide an enjoyable DIY project and can yield improvements, but I believe there's a balance between those upgrades and recognizing the limits imposed by the original design. It’s also worth considering whether the time and effort involved in such upgrades would be better invested in purchasing a speaker that already achieves the desired performance out of the box.
@@hoosierhifi5183 well, it is half truth, some 600usd speakers will use much better quality components that other 600usd speaker , proportional upgrade to 600usd speaker with 200usd of parts upgrade will vary with result of the upgrade as some 600usd speakers use a tweeter costing 15usd and sounding like it while some 600usd speakers will use much better quality tweeter costing 40usd but sounding better than some 90usd tweeters from some 3000usd speakers .
My point is you can't assume as all speakers and upgrades a open book approach where you need to do intelligent analysis of what is worth to upgrade and how much to spend on what area of the speaker .
Biggest point is when done wisely crossover and cabinet/posts/stands will make the speakers sound much cleaner and if they did cost much more than initial price spend on the speaker and upgrade .... Go for it and have fun observing the changes and make assessment used in your next projects . Yes even 10000usd speakers with stock crossover parts worth say 300usd can be upgraded to better quality and it will sound better , much better as drivers , cabinet, posts are all much better quality than in 600usd speaker so more expensive speaker makes more sense to upgrade.
Example , Magico floor standers sold for 11000usd use Mundorf Caps worth 60usd (I know their sound and there is a ton of room for improvement with better Cap.
So let's not smear the fact that upgrades almost always make sense if you care about sound quality .
Well said Sir!!!!. As always very professionally done.
Kit speakers or custom are always better than mass market.
Andrew gets commissions will say anything for money
For me there are a couple of good reasons to do an upgrade:
1: for the fun of it, on a set of speakers you like but know are flawed (likey you've had for a while or have bought cheap second hand.)
2: as a hobby project to resurrect a vintage set. You know, bring them into the 21st century.
3: As a repair job where wiring and/or other internal components have gone bad and instead of replacing, you'd rather repair and upgrade.
Because you want to see how good you can get a set of Sony SCSS-5's sounding.😅 (Falls into the hobby project)
However:
Simply 'fixing' a modern speaker you just bought new... This is counter productive. In this case I agree with Andrew. Better to buy the speaker you like the sound of and be done with it. Doing a good audition of speakers is so important here. Andrew often says: 'Remember, the only person who has to like the sound of your system is you.' i feel this is where he's really comming from. If the crossover is a pice of tin foil and steel wire wraped around a nail and it sound good to you👍. If you don't like the sound. Don't buy. His reviews are no targeted at the diy/hobbiest. They're often at the mid-to-high end buyer that wants to know how it sounds, not really the underlying nuts and bolts.
Keep up the good work Danny and GR team. I always learn something.
Jordan
This video popped up on my feed and I thought Andrew Robinson sounded familiar, I looked through my history and had started watching his video "Do Home Theaters NEED a CENTER SPEAKER?" at one point and remember being extremely off put by the weird interview sitting in a chair style with blurred background...Strange. But to each their own. I watched for about 5 minutes and couldn't take his voice or the female background voice anymore... I've always been of the mindset, if you don't like it, don't buy it. If you don't want an expensive cable, don't buy it. If you don't want to buy a speaker upgrade, don't buy it. I'm just getting into the DIY speaker world and can't believe how much smack talk there is about this company. I bought a center channel kit from GR and couldn't be happier. Questions were always answered, no pressure was ever put on me, just great customer service and a quality product.
All I know is, I have speakers the manufacturers highly regarded ,once I tested the speakers , was quite disappointed and wanted to return them. I found out you had an upgrade kit for those speakers I bought and installed the upgrade kit , am I glad I did ,I can almost melt into the same music after the upgrade that I was disappointed before. I trust your work because the results is definite, stay unwavering some of us that know better got your back through your proven work, those that do not know ignorance is bliss
I think you missed his point and made his point at the same time. Here’s an analogy. He’s saying buy the car you like and if you don’t like it trade it in for one you do. Your saying buy a car if you don’t like it puts new rims, wrap it, put a turbo on it and so on. It just different preferences.
Bingo.
I would urge everyone to buy an older vehicle and fix it up. Less in the landfill and will likely last longer than a car made these days. I own a ‘89 190e and it will go to my kid
I'm really glad to have run across GR recently and appreciate what you do and how you do it. It just makes sense and sounds like the truth. well said and the high road taken. you clearly care about the quality of music reproduction and the experience. Its the difference between what an audio engineer and a salesman can offer. for a sales type to say he doesnt care what's in a product? fine. but there are those who do care, because it matters, and want to learn and improve and arent afraid to learn, as opposed to that smug, know it all attitude (usually a cover for insecurity). no one benefits from that but the salesman's ego. great work.
He is true, only sound matters to the customer. For 99%. The 1% would like to know. But the 99% is where the money comes so ask again who cares. Not me too. I do know the speakers i use sounds good. Iw had few, from genelec G5 to "the ones" to few Klipsh models to Jamo one to and so on. Triangle antal stays. For now :D You can upgrade the crossovers and what ever, that is like changing engines intakes and adding turbo to the car, its not for everyone, maybe to the 1%.
How you arrive at your percentages.
99 to 1? It could be 70 to 30.
Soundstage/Imaging, a genuinely Holographic presentation is the single-most important factor in EVERY aspect of my audio equipment. Across the board. This is coming from someone who began selling high-end retail audio back in the 80s. I've had all of these years to determine what provides the most enjoyable experience (for me).
I stopped watching his channel long ago. Quickly became obvious what his understanding and skill level was of audio.
Danny, you burst my bubble! I thought that I was the only one placing components on the positive and negative side. I feel somewhat inspired to make a crossover using a buffalo nickel as the base and using cheddar core inductors with twine insulated wires, and a gum wrapper to conseal the contents. Definitely a Mickey mouse job!
Andrew & Kristi.... I love your reviews. I get what you're doing and why. No issues with it at all. BUT..... There's a lot of validity to what Danny is saying. I realize your not engineers and just want results and caring how the results happen isn't important. I get that we live in a world of buy good or buy better. Not picking a side, because Danny knows I'm brutally honest.
Danny.... something you didn't mention. The expense to upgrade a speakers crossover isn't always going to provide enough "leveling up" to warrant the cost. The gain can be fractional on some speakers and simply isn't worth it.. Some speaker can really use an upgrade, but not all and not all are worth the investment.
When the cost just isn't worth it then I don't offer the upgrade.
@@dannyrichie9743 But that's subjective. I gave this video a thumbs up and never have done that for any of your videos. Why? It's a good explanation as to why better parts create better sounds.... in most cases. ;) Do a video on driver speed and how controlling that speed is important to sound. As a matter of fact, do a video series on speakers from A to Z, meaning cover design, driver selection, crossover builds, etc. etc. I think it would be good for the audience to understand a bit of the engineering, kind like you did in his video.
@@lithiumstaticHow can it be subjective when Danny clearly explains the speaker charts, frequency curve and waterfall ?
and plus he has the experience to decide if certain upgrades are not worth it !
@@azar3006 The money in exchange for what someone feels is of good value. Not arguing data.
I'am a hobbyist that was buying from Zalytron on long Island back in the day. I had "the books" and some software but learned that it was much better to send the drivers out to madisound, have them analyzed, and have the crossovers designed by people that really knew how to use LEAP. That being stated, It's obvious i got my feet pretty wet and the few people that are getting into this now, should really carefully watch, listen, and understand your vids. They are 100% accurate. If I was to do another build (which im not), I would send the drivers to GR, or Madisound! But it gets to the point where one would be better off simply buying a proven speaker other than wasting countless hours trying to re-invent the wheel! Edit: as far as your upgrades, it's a great idea and small investment for people that want to keep and upgrade their "vintage" speakers, or even "fix" the newer ones that they may own! Thank you for such great vids!!!
Excellent explanation of how parts effect sound. I built a pair of your Brutes with the high end options. I could not find a speaker anywhere that performs as well for the price. I have built several pairs of speakers including Open Baffles, which are my favorite. Parts do matter! Facts are often difficult for people today, Danny you need to put more feeling into your reviews so the wannabe's can understand what your offering. Andrew is clearly a very sensitive man, he needs a hug.
"Andrew is clearly a very sensitive man, he needs a hug." LOL, he sometimes looks like he is giving himself chills when describing a product.
You, sir, are a gentleman, a professional, and most likely a genius. Andrew is just a listener. But I really like his interpretations on some things. I’ve actually purchased some of the things he recommended which leave me very happy with the purchase I made however, after watching your channel I bet you things can get better.
I stopped watching his channel a long time ago. If I had not, going out of his way to demonstrate ignorance about speaker design would have done the trick. 🤪
Andrew is a bit of a yes man.
Me too. I stopped following that channel also because I didn't like the 'smug' attitude that I detected on their channel. GR Research emphasise that a lot of speakers are obviously made to a price point, but if the speaker is well designed then GR Research are able to make your original purchase sound significantly better for a modest outlay and bit of DIY input - and who doesn't like a bit of DIY input!
Same..he went more gatekeeper elitist, so I dropped out.
I agree. I have changed X-over parts on multiple speakers and every time, it’s a noticeable improvement.
I don't bother watching any reviewer who does not at least look inside the box. If they're going to put in such low effort, then they're not worth my time.
My GR-Research crossover upgrades were my first introduction to how speakers should really sound and led me down the right path in my audio journey which has brought me many hours of enjoyment. In my opinion after experiencing the upgrade experience myself, anyone who thinks negatively about it doesn't know what they are talking about or are biased for some financial or other self interest.
well in a way Andrew is right. There is a clear segmentation in the audio equipment market. The DIY and tinkering aspect of the hobby is not to everybodies liking. And for those, who don't want to bother with this aspect, it's probably not worth it to do an upgrade. Andrew is calling this a boutique market (and it surely is, if you want this kind of parts quality from stock speakers). But even Danny kind of agrees, that it's often better to start from scratch (with one of his kits), than to try and fix something that never was intended to reach this kind of quality in the first place.
Humble honest and great points. I have been around “high end” hifi with my dad since the 70s. I’ve worked with some people who are very well known in the industry. This is not bs. I built a power supply and swapped caps for a year before I landed on the right filter caps. When it comes together it is amazing.
Recently I completed the Dennis Murphy Mod for my Pioneer SP-BS22 bookshelf speakers. I can say there absolutely was a great improvement in sound. The sound stage is now more expansive and deep with a smoother high end. I learned from practical hard proof: Crossovers matter. The original speakers were quite nice for the price but the upgrade took them to a new level.
Fun! Enjoy them, I did. It's too bad the BS22 is not made anymore.
"People making budget speakers put in 10 cent parts. I spend $1 and that makes a big difference." --A.J.
😊
As a guy who enjoys building DIY computers, I totally understand where you are coming from. There are different audiences for for audio just as there are for computers, and the "truth" will change accordingly for each group. There are enthusiasts and there are DIY hobbyists. What makes sense for a DIY guy who will welcome the challenge of upgrading something and appreciate the results a lot of times will not makes sense for the person looking to buy something and be satisfied out of the box.
I have listened to both of these men. I will continue to listen to both of these men. I do not see this as a reason to "pick a side" or turn this into some street beef-type situation.
The upgrade tech talks are the best bit. I've learned so much about speaker design from this channel. The keep it simple design philosophy in GR-Research really works. I understand the acoustic physics, but the hands on design / measure / iteration approach is the best.
I admire both Danny and Andrew. I think it’ll be educational for Andrew to visit GR and bring his reviewer expertise to Danny. In this wonderful hobby one can always learn.💎💎
Andrew will never do that.
There is no cash in it. That`s all he cares about.
I doubt he'll take up Andrew on the offer. That crossover comment leads me to believe that most of his subscribers don't care about understanding the impact of crossovers.
Holy cow did I learn a lot on this one. Thank you!
Gosh andrew’s facial expressions are so smug. He should at least try to hide how pleased he is with himself.
One of the most punchable faces I've seen in some time. That pompous smirk is next level. Chuffed with his own ignorance.
I detest that schmoozy bastard.
He is a Queen. Once you realize he is gay then everything makes sense.
@@seanb3303 I'm not going to participate in gay-bashing, but I can't stand that schmoozy bastard.
@@seanb3303 My comments regarding Andrew keep getting deleted, but suffice to say I can't stand that schmoozy @#$&(.
It's NUTS. I just upgraded my first crossover on a pair of 60s Sansui SP-200s. Craziest thing I've heard... I honestly never thought it would make that big of a difference. They will blow away a lot of super high end stuff now.
Crossovers are the weakest point on any speaker that are build for price point what ever is the price point, period. I upgraded my speakers crossovers with better components and it was BIG upgrade! All those cheap sandcast resistors, electrolytic capacitors and iron core coils removed with better parts was game chancer!
Very classy response Danny you just showed how much of a gentleman you are. I was watching the whole time thinking invite Andrew invite Andrew….and bam! 👍🏻
I find it fascinating that we are being told that you need a special room set up to listen to your speakers in the real world are a least in my world our entertainment is usually set up in our living area , everyone doesn't have the luxury of have a dedicated listen room
Watch the video again, he's specifically referring to reviewers, even goes out of his way to explain he's not talking about customers lol.
Hello Danny, this is Anthony from DE. Outstanding video
Very informative and one of your best videos!!
Danny you should make a test set on encores and use cheap crossover parts send it to Jay. He would be a good guy to do a fair comparison . Do a downgrade to prove your point.
Great idea! I hope he sees this
18:14 "what makes it sound different is how much the signal is degraded" is a good argument for active crossovers, I'd say. Basically then there's nothing between the drivers and amplifiers except for some (usually very short) cable.
I can say this much for a fact - every single time I've had the chance to compare actives to passives, regardless of price, the actives win. Much more dynamic and "fun" because the amp has full control over that driver with no crossover components that store energy or add resistance between them.
12:20 Andrew: As an electrical engineer and an audiophile, I CARE about the crossover network design and components.
Danny and Hans are about the only audiophile guys I trust on RUclips any more. This has been a tremendous video. And I remain a very happy GR Research customer.
❤Andrew, his reviews are straight talk and resonate with 99% of us hobbyists who despise the hate filled forums snobbery and people telling what me what I should like.
Honestly, a bit arrogant to think he’s talking about you, he was referencing his career and what he’s seen over the years.
In this hobby I am much more like Danny than I am Andrew. But I like Andrew. I think your first point is spot on, Andrew’s audience is mostly the casual listener who wants good sound and is not obsessed over the details and with that what Andrew said about crossovers is probably valid. But to your second point, while I do know about Andrew’s past and that he himself was once madly obsessed to the point where he literally endured emotional and financial stress, he was in fact talking about Danny in his comment as well. No question. He’s mentioned Danny before. Andrew used to be an obsessed audiophile with systems costing tens of thousands and I get why he became the “recovering audiophile” when he walked away from it all but I think he’s swung too far and where he could remain positive and preach the lessons he’s learned he’s chosen to be negative about it and a bit snarky at times.
I used to watch Robinson’s channel. Just his attitude toward the “I don’t care what’s inside of a speaker.” It honestly made me very disappointed and upset to hear him say. As I said on his page “I care what’s inside my speakers.” I enjoy replacing caps let alone researching what individual caps sounds like even within the same brand! Please Keep up the excellent dedication to our speakers Danny!
Another point is, ,in general, the higher end higher cost speakers tend to use better parts in the x-over, wiring, connectors etc.. Why would they do that if it made no differeince? PS audio speakers for instance. Nothing but high quality parts.
I have pair of Timekeeper 2’s from Tyler Acousics designed by Danny. I hear new things in music I have been listening to for 50 years!! Amazing sound & detail. Danny is the real deal!!
Danny,
It's real simple,... tell those guys to whip out a dual trace oscilloscope, and a high quality signal generator...
Set the o-scope up for dual trace mode, as well as your divisions for an audio time based grid, and then put your signal generator on square wave mode..
Place one "trace", or probe directly to the output of the signal generator, then pass the signal THROUGH what ever component you want to do diagnostics on....
The scope will (WILL) show the differences between iron core inductors, sand cast resistors, and electrolytic caps VS using HQ AIR core inductors, poly FILM caps, and wire wound resistors...
I've een in the industry for decades, and believe me- this simple O-scope test will show the differences in ringing, smearing, and time delays..
Yes it will show the difference, but is it audible to the human ear.
@@russellperry3605 YEP!... But, do NOT take my word for it... try it yourself with some on hand parts you might have laying around, .... make a simple 2/3/4 pole tweeter XO with electrolytics , then a decent grade music quality cap.. Now, you might not hear the difference between a 30 dollar cap, and a 99 dollar cap, but when compared to electrolytics, you DO hear the diference...
Literally decades before I ever heard about GR Research I knew that upgrading crossovers can make a tremendous difference. Redesigning poor crossovers is beyond where I take upgrades, but obviously a poor design is best replaced by a better one. No question.
i think you and Andrew are on more of the same level than you both think. the niche market he's referring to is the speaker "hot-rodders" like yourself. nothing wrong with it, just not for everyone
This is an excellent account on the importance of parts quality in the signal path. Well done.
I believe Andrew once said that speakers don't break-in over time. I stepped back from him after hearing that opinion.
He never had a pair for over a week. Yeah, dudes is just a Shill. Dandy Andy shines alot of shoes and he gives em that hawk tuah shine
I've never watched his videos but the clip where he said that he didn't care about the crossover was way over the top and revealed a disdain for a deeper understanding of audio technology.
Danny is right about Andrew. I did upgraded two pairs of tower speakers of KLIPSCH on my own before I knew about GR Research and those speakers turned out so much better than original parts
You're always criticised by those who do less never more. These companies pay very little into research & design & expect consumers to just such up the end product.
you did very little to spell check.
Like me, I'll bet a good amount of people do not have money to spend on audio. I've built all my own gear and at one point decided on spending $450 on a pair of vintage B&W 602 S2's and $300 for Danny's upgrade, I don't think I could've found anything comparable in that price range. Thanks Danny for helping plenty of us out!
Andrew comes off as a Best Buy sales guy in a previous life...
That is a good description. I don't trust hyperbole.
Phenomenal explanation and analysis. Thank you!
Andrew’s “who cares” response came across as hugely pompous to me. Big turn off.
@@jwilson086 yup...ego pride pompous arrogant all knowing and yet admits his limitations of understanding, that pretty much sums up everyone born in 1980 to present. Lol.
Definitely has an asshole vibe to him.
Weird you were turned on by another man anyway.
Not sure if pompous as much as pure ignorance which is just as bad, especially ignorance regarding a field that he should be well versed in.
Andy is a QUEEN
Andrew thinks that the B&W 801 D4 is a fantastic speaker. It's also obvious he's bought and paid for! I'm a Brit living in the States since 1990. This speaker was my personal "Holy Grail" and I bought a pair earlier this year. I can tell you I have never been so disappointed in my entire life. They are getting changed out, but as of late I'm not sure what to.
Phil, so what did you do eventually? My mate in London has B&W’s too and I never liked them. Too much Boom and Tizz although less Tizzy now my top end hearing is reducing with age. I have fully active Linn Keltiks since 1997 and only changed the front end and Power amps since then. But I follow Danny as I’ve modified the speakers for my Home Cinema in our new house in Germany. Steve from Derbyshire over in Germany.
Andrew Robinson isn’t interested in learning any of this. He only wants to gain and maintain subscribers and give positive reviews and not Pi$$ off the manufacturers of the reviewed products or the fans of those products. I find it a bit intellectually dishonest and short changing his viewers through his incomplete reviews. The Hi Fi reviewer Trump would watch
@@stephenyoud6125 I think Trump has more intelligence than the entire Democrat party combined, and you included! That was a stupid comment to make, and WTF has this dick's reviews got to do with politics and who is there to take down the Cabal??. I'm a Brit in America Trump supporter, and there is a good reason why I left the UK YEARS ago! One more time, these speakers are shite. MIne are going up for sale.
@@stephenyoud6125WTF dude! How is POTUS relevant to this topic? Are you able to have a conversation without bringing up politics?
@@RW-ur7ym because Trump isn’t interested in facts and data and neither is Andrew Robinson, at least in this situation he’s shown no interest in understanding how speakers actually work and only been cynical about those that want to enhance and improve performance. I find his lack of intellectual curiosity disheartening and his reviews of little value
Thanks for the video, I'm still loving my X-statiks.
Wow!! I learned a lot about speakers from you. I understand why someone would ask what's inside the speaker.
Andrew said: "As long as a speaker sounds good, I don't care what parts are used inside it". His logic is sound, as the end goal is for a speaker to sound good.
Behzad - please stop commenting - you really sound stupid!
He’s doing himself and his viewers a gross disservice by failing to acknowledge and recognize what the factors are that drive the performance. He for whatever reason chooses to believe that manufacturers really know what they doing and will always do what’s necessary to obtain the optimum performance and what you get is exactly what the designer intended. Basically he’s simply demonstrating an embarrassing level of ignotance